PKR DSIA yg cuba menegakkan benang yg basah

1. In the corruption trial, Judge Augustine Paul allowed the prosecution to amend the charges such that DSAI was alleged to have abused his power to protect himself from “embarrassment” rather than “criminal action or proceedings” and refer to the “allegations” against him. The change in wording meant that the prosecution did not have to prove the truth of the allegations made by Ummi and Azizan. 2. Evidence, i.e. the mattress, was expunged from the court record and as a result the defense was not permitted to challenge the evidence. It should be noted that the government chemist had cautioned that the forensic evidence was not conclusive, “DNA should not be the sole foundation for finding a person guilty”. 3. Criminal Investigations officer Mohamad Rodwan Yusuf said he could not guarantee that the mattress had not been tampered with. No photographs were taken when it was seized and it was kept for four months before being sent for testing. Furthermore, police had no records of who had access to the mattress during that period. 4. Judge Augustine Paul ruled the defense of political conspiracy as irrelevant. In the 2001 Federal Court hearing of the appeal of lawyer Zainur Zakaria ‘s contempt of court case, the judges were manifestly displeased with this ruling and commented that the defense had the right to choose its line of defense as it saw fit, and was entitled to call witnesses as it deemed necessary without interference. 5. The defense team was harassed during the course of the trial; defense lawyer Zainur bin Zakaria was held in contempt of court and sentenced to three month imprisonment. This judgment was later overturned by the Federal Court with severe reprimand of the judge in June 2001, with one of the judges describing Judge Augustine Paul as “more like acting as counsel for the prosecution”. 6. Police officers searched the offices of another member of the defense team, Pawancheek Merican, on 3rd Dec 1998, on the pretext that documents were reported missing by DPP Azahar, who did not give the police reason to suspect the defense team. Ulasan dari Lokman Nor Bin Adam(x ahli PKR) Apa pun alasan yang anwar berikan utk buktikan dirinya tidak bersalah, itu semua hanya layak dihidangkan pada rakyat malaysia yang belum pernah beliau lembukan.Tapi sekarang,jumlah mereka yang telah di sedar bahawa diri mereka telah dilembukan oleh Anwar semakin ramai.Nak tahu anwar ni peliwat atau tidak mudah je.Kita lihat sahajalah, Anwar sanggup buat apa sahaja utk buktikan dia tak bersalah spt buat roadshow satu malaysia,ajak rakyat turun demonstrasi,hantar org keluar negara pengaruh pelabur supaya jangan melabur di malaysia dan macam2 lagi utk menghebahkan bahawa beliau teraniaya.Tapi cuba kita fikirkan kenapa anwar tak boleh buat benda yg tak sampaipun 10 saat utk membersihkan namanya. Apa yg Anwar susah sgt nak bersumpah dgn kalimah Wallahi Wabillahi Wattallahi bahawa beliau tak pernah melihat mana2 lelaki? Kalau beliau bersumpah masa di Masjid Negara 20/9/98, takde seorangpun umat islam akan percaya dgn Dr Mahathir.Sampai skrg Anwar tak berani bersumpah kerana dia tahu jika dia sumpah guna kalimah ini,dan jika sumpah itu palsu, maka Allah akan balas perbuatannya cash didunia, tak tunggu akhirat.